S.Subbulakshmi v. The Supdt. Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Petition (MD)No.10016 of 2015 S.Subbulakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the name of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate

O R D E R

The petitioner's husband is seen an accused in three cases, alleging that the petitioner is being harassed by the second respondent, this petition has been filed.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused the records.

3. The learned Government Advocate submitted that no such harassment is made against the petitioner by the respondent police.

4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed and the said submission is recorded. No Costs.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. However, it is made clear that in the absence of any specific compliant of the petitioner, the second respondent shall not call her to the police station.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Writs) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2. The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Kovilpatti, Tuticorin District.

+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.32340 PJL RL/4 c- 30/6/2015 W.P.(MD)No.10016 of 2015 19.06.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/