A.Navamani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of October Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.6534 of 2017 A.NAVAMANI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.MALAIYENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) For Intervener : MR.V.SANTHAKUMARESAN, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who are arrayed as accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 & 420 IPC on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the petitioner is that the de-facto complainant filed a complaint before the respondent police against the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing on behalf of the State, on instructions, would submit that till date, there is no complaint registered against the petitioner. 4.Considering the non-registration of complaint, there is no apprehension for arrest. Accordingly, this petition filing for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ grant of anticipatory bail before this Court does not arise.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file anticipatory bail as and when a complaint is registered by the law enforcing agency.

sd/- 23/10/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6534 of 2017 Date :23/10/2017 PK/CM/SAR-3/01.11.2017 : 2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/