J.Santhosh v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8531 of 2018 1 J.SANTHOSH 2 V.RENJITHKUMAR 3 Y.BASKARAN 4 B.JOYAL 5 S.SOBITHAM 6 R.RANI 7 V.VASANTHA 8 A.VASANTHAKUMAR 9 P.KALA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 9 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADASERI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.191/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.T.THIRUMURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABU Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 294(b) and 506 (ii) IPC and Section 3(i) of the Tamilnadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss), Act, 1992, in Crime No.191 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate submitted that there was a civil dispute between the petitioners and the de facto complainant, the petitioners are said to have trespassed into the de facto complainant's land and damaged his brother's car and the hut also. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagercoil, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 17/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, NAGERCOIL.

2 -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADASERI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, I MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.THIRUMURUGAN Advocate SR.No.8784

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8531 of 2018 Date :17/05/2018 SM/VS MV:DD:RNB:22/05/2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/