Samuel v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.S.RAMESH CRL OP(MD) No.8509 of 2018 SAMUEL ... PETITIONER / 1st ACCUSED Vs STATE REP. BY 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI.

in CRIME NO.462 of 2017 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBCID, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANTS For Petitioner : M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC and altered into Sections 120(b), 406, 420, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.2 of 2018 and seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that totally there are 8 accused in this case and the petitioner along with others misappropriated the de-facto complainant's firm money. He further submitted that except this petitioner/A1, other accused were released on bail and anticipatory bail respectively.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that the co-accused had already been released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 17/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NANGUNERI.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAKADU POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBCID, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

5.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.8748

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8509 of 2018 Date :17/05/2018 ns/aav JM/PN/SAR 1/18.05.2018/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/