← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6558/2017ordered

S.Jeyabalan v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-06-05Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.6558 of 2017 S.JEYABALAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMELKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT CRIME NO. 136/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.PADMA RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 324 and 332 of IPC., read with Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.136 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. 3.The case of the prosecution is that on 16.05.2017, due to quarrel between A1, A2 and the defacto complainant at the time of bus strike, A1 attacked the defacto complainant using stone. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that due to bus strike there was a quarrel between the accused persons and the defacto complainant. The petitioner is the driver of the TNSTC bus and on the confession of the accused, the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. A1 was already released on bail and A2 was enlarged on anticipatory bail. The petitioner is no way connected with the alleged occurrence.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 05/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,ARANTHANGI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAMELKUDI POLICE STATION,PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.C.PADMA RAJ Advocate SR.No.23326 PJL CSL/PM-PN/SAR-I/12.06.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6558 of 2017 Date :05/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/