← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8590/2018ordered

Mallika, W/O.Thangapandian, v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-23Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8590 of 2018 1 MALLIKA 2 SUBBULAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOW KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.PRABU RAMACHANDRAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.254 of 2018 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant by using filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that no one was injured in the said occurrence.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that no one is injured, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 23/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, TIRUNELVELI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAYAMKOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.9122.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8590 of 2018 Date :23/05/2018 SDS/DD/GSR/24.05.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/