← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8628/2018ordered

Rameez Fathima v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-23Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8628 of 2018 RAMEEZ FATHIMA ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENIKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.92/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.PRABHU RAMACHANDRAN Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324, 427 and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.92 of 2018 and seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive the petitioner said to have intercepted the defacto complainant's car and pelted stone and also threatened him with dire consequences. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

sd/- 23/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

2 -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KENIKARAI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.9065

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8628 of 2018 Date :23/05/2018 CP/PJI MV:PMI:GSR:24/05/2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/