Muruganantham v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8650 of 2018 MURUGANANTHAM ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANDAPAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 50/2018. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt.Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 342, 324, 506 (ii) IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No. 50 of 2018 and seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has way laid the defacto complainant's husband and attacked him when he was returning from the Ration Shop.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner is said to have attacked the defacto complainant's husband and caused injury. She further submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rameshwaram, Ramanathapuram, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. sd/- 23/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMESHWARAM. RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANDAPAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate SR.No.9032

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8650 of 2018 Date :23/05/2018 PNN MV:DD:GSR:24/05/2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/