Seenivasagan @ Vignesh v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirty First day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8679 of 2018 1 SEENIVASAGAN @ VIGNESH 2 MANOJKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ A-2 & A-3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MASARPATTI POLICE STATION, MASARPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO.32 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.PON SENTHIL KUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506 (ii) IPC in Crime No.32 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. 3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the defacto complainant lodged a complaint on 17.05.2018, stating that the petitioners abused when the defacto complainant questioned the conduct one Kannan and the petitioners warned him not to meet the mother of the petitioners. He further submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on their executing a bond https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Villathikullam, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. sd/- 31/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VILLATHIKULLAM.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MASARPATTI POLICE STATION, MASARPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.PON SENTHIL KUMARAN Advocate SR.No.9284

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8679 of 2018 Date :31/05/2018 MS/CM/VK/01.06.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/