Revathy v. The Superintendent Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.10.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.20377 of 2016 Revathy .. Petitioner Vs.

State through 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ramesh For respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the first respondent to direct the second respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members based on the enquiry. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is Accused No.2 in Cr.No.328 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, there is no question of harassment.

4.Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sanarpatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P(MD)No.20377 of 2016 ssl SH/SKS-RR:14.11.2016:2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/