Mahadevan v. The Inspector Of Police`

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of January Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL OP(MD) No.20413 of 2016 MAHADEVAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKOTTAI (CR.NO.NOT KNOWN/2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.K.BALASUNDARAM Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. The learned counsel for the intervenor is also present.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry alone is pending against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent Police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also

considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), the respondent Police is directed to register an FIR or close the enquiry as expeditiously as possible and the respondent Police should not harass the petitioner during enquiry and the petitioner shall cooperate with the enquiry.

5.With the above observations, this Criminal Original petition is closed.

sd/- 23/01/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.4175 +1cc to M/s. K.BAALASUNDHARAM Advocate in SR. No.3671 NBJ JSI/MSM/JM/31.01.2017/2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.20413 of 2016 Date :23/01/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/