Vellaichamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.10.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.20455 of 2016 1.Vellaichamy 2.Vijayan 3.Thiyagarajan : Petitioners/A1 to A3 -vs1.State represented by Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District. ; R1/Complainant (Crime No.60 of 2015) 2.Manikatti @ Karuppaiyah : R2/De-Complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in STC No.97 of 2015 on the file of the learned District Munsif-cumJudicial Magistrate, Natham and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Kannan For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman

O R D E R

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the case in STC No.97 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham and quash the same.

2.Today when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning, the petitioners/A1 to A3 and the de-facto complainant along with their counsel appeared in person. They have filed a joint Memorandum of compromise stating that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection to quash the proceedings in STC No.97 of 2015 in connection with the Crime No.60 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC r/w 109 IPC stating that the disputes have been settled between them. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

would submit that the petitioners are ready to denote Rs.15,000/- to the Harijan Sevak Sangh, Madurai.

3.In view of the above, this court directed the petitioners to pay Rs.15,000/- to Tamil Nadu Harijan Sevak Sangh, N.M.R.Subbaraman Memorial Residential Primary School Campus, 12, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Vinayagar Nagar, Opposite to Law College, Madurai-20 and also this court dispensed with the appearance of the parties.

4.In the afternoon, when the matter is called, the receipt has been filed. In view of the statement made by the parties and the joint compromise memo filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved to proceed further in this matter.

5.In view of that, this petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in respect of STC No.97 of 2015 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham, is quashed against the petitioners. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the record.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To, Encl:Here in enter the Joint Compromise Memo Xerox copy enclosed: 1 The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Natham 2.The Inspector of Police, Natham Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai.

4 The Officer Incharge, Tamil Nadu Harijan Sevak Sangh, N.M.R.Subbaraman Memorial Residential Primary School Campus, 12, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Vinayagar Nagar, Opposite to Law College, Madurai-20 +1 cc to M/S.V.KANNAN, Advocate SR.No.63519 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.20455 of 2016 25.10.2016 SMA/CK/14.11.2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/