K. Sambasivam, v. Tamil Nadu Generation
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.07.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.11989 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 K.Sambasivam ... Petitioner/Petitioner -vs1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Coporation, (TANGEDCO), Rep. by its Chairman, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-22.
2.The Chief Engineer, TANGEDCO, Trichy.
3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Tanjore.
4.The Director of Technical Education, Tamil Nadu, Guindy, Chennai.
... Respondents/ Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to selection list for the post of ITI HELPER (Trainee) published by the respondent corporation on 20.02.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent board to conduct recruitment afresh for the post of ITI HELPER the future recruitment for the post of ITI HELPER (Trainee).
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jawahar For Respondents : No Appearance (for R-1 to R-3) Mr.M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader (for R-4)
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the fourth respondent submitted that the process of selection
for appointment to the post of ITI Helper (Trainee) had been concluded during the year 2014 and the selected candidates were appointed and they are working as ITI Helper (Trainee) for the past more than five years.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the process of selection for appointment to the post of ITI Helper (Trainee) was not conducted transparently and the established principles for selection were not scrupulously followed by the respondents.
3. This Court cannot adjudicate these broad grounds at this length of time, in view of the fact that the selected candidates were appointed during the year 2014 and they are working as ITI Helper (Trainee) for the past more than five years. This apart, the writ petitioner has not neither impleaded the appointed candidates as party respondents nor challenged the appointment orders issued in their favour in the present writ petition. 4.
However, The writ petitioner is at liberty to participate in the ensuing recruitments, if any notified by the respondents. In such an event, the case of the writ petitioner is also to be considered along with all other eligible candidates for appointment.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Coporation, (TANGEDCO), 800, Anna Salai, Chennai-22.
2.The Chief Engineer, TANGEDCO, Trichy.
3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Tanjore.
4.The Director of Technical Education, Tamil Nadu, Guindy, Chennai.
+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-73897[F] dated 08/07/2019 ) sji/ns W.P.(MD) No.11989 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 05.07.2019 KM/(22.07.2019) 3P 6C