Mathiyalagan.N v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
1. N.Mathiyalagan
2. P.Sekar
3. C.Paul Lourduraj
4. N.Dhanapal
5. M.Dhandapani
6. R.Raju
7. G.Rajasekar
8. S.Duraisamy
9. K.R.Subramanian
10. N.Sivanesan
11. V.Velusamy ... Petitioners Vs 1/6
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
3. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirapalli District.
... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction the eligible Dearness Allowance mentioned in the affidavit and as per Calculation of D.A. List filed in the typed set of papers along with 6 percent interest per annum to the petitioners within the time limit that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioners : Mr. N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.J.John Rajadurai Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to sanction the eligible Dearness Allowance mentioned in the affidavit and as per Calculation of D.A. List filed in the typed set of papers 2/6
along with 6 percent interest per annum to the petitioners within the time limit that may be fixed by this Court.
2. By consent of both parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
3. The writ petitioners are working in the respondent Corporation. They reached the age of superannuation and retired from service. They alleges that while computing their terminal benefits, their dearness allowance was erroneously reckoned. According to them, the figures are as follows:- Name of the petitioner D.A. percentage ought to have been taken by the respondent Corporation D.A. percentage taken (at the time of retirement) by the respondent Corporation 9% 12% 12% 12% 12% 17% 21% 34% 34% 34% 34% 7% 9% 9% 9% 9% 12% 17% 31% 31% 31% 31%
1. N.Mathiyalagan
2. P.Sekar
3. C.Paul Lourduraj
4. N.Dhanapal
5. M.Dhandapani
6. R.Raju
7. G.Rajasekar
8. S.Duraisamy
9. K.R.Subramanian
10. N.Sivanesan
11. V.Velusamy 3/6
4. I consciously refrain from going into the question as to whether the aforesaid table is factually correct. It is however beyond dispute that the dearness allowance as mentioned in their respective computation was on the lower side. Therefore, the respondents are directed to rework the petitioners' terminal benefits by taking their dearness allowance at the appropriate rate. The differential amount shall be paid to the writ petitioners within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This payment will carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of on these terms. There shall be no order as to costs.
25.03.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PNM 4/6
To
1. The Secretary, The Government of Tamil Nadu, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
3. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai, Trichirapalli District.
5/6
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
PNM ORDER IN 25.03.2024 6/6