David v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7186 of 2017 1.David 2.Arockiam 3.Mary rathinam : Petitioners Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

2. Sathipa : Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 1st respondent not to harass the petitioners and their family members under the guise of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Syed Ali For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan for R1 Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted there is no complaint against this petitioner pending with the first respondent police. But, however the petitioner has sent an advocate notice, dated 10.06.2017 to the first respondent making unfounded allegations.

2. Recording the same, this petition is dismissed with a direction to the first respondent to ignore the advocate notice dated 10.06.2017 and take action against the petitioner if he is involved in any cognizable offence.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC to M/s.N.SYED ALI, Advocate, SR No. 60322 JIKR PSM/KP/SAR1/23.06.2017/1P/3C Order made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7186 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 14.06.2017