S. Ramesh v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ CRL OP(MD) No.20633 of 2016 1 S. RAMESH 2 VLAMMAL 3 SELVANAYAGAM ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs State rep.by its THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANDU POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, CR NO. 209 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code in Crime No.209 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner Nos.1 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Respondent police is directed to send a compliance report to the Office of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not. sd/- 26/10/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM 2 -do-thro THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANDU POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1cc to M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN, ADVOCATE SR.No. 64719 sm:GSV-PM:SAR 3:03/11/2016:2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.20633 of 2016 Date :26/10/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/