Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20695/2016allowed

A. Thomas Raj v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2016-11-01Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD) No.20695 of 2016 1.A.Thomas Raj 2.Soundirarajan : Petitioners/A1 and A2 -vs1.The State rep. By The Sub Inspector of Police, Puzhuthipatty Police Station, Sivagangai District. : R1/Complainant 2.P.C.Arumugam : R2/De-factco complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in Crime No.43 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and pass such further orders.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sivalingam For 1st Respondent : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For 2nd Respondent : Mr.K.Murugan

O R D E R

This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records relating to the case in Crime No.43 of 2016 under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC, on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.

2.Today when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning, the petitioners/A1 and A2 and the de-facto complainant along with their counsel appeared in person. They have filed a joint Memorandum of compromise stating that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the de-facto complainant has no objection to quash the proceedings in respect of Crime No.43 of 2016 stating that the disputes have been settled between them. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are willing to denote Rs.20,000/- to the Harijan Sevak Sangh, Madurai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In view of the above, this court permitted the petitioner to pay Rs.20,000/- to Tamil Nadu Harijan Sevak Sangh, N.M.R.Subbaraman Memorial Residential Primary School Campus, 12, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Vinayagar Nagar, Opposite to Law College, Madurai-20 and also this court dispensed with the appearance of the parties.

4.In the afternoon, when the matter is called, the receipt has been filed. In view of the statement made by the parties and the joint compromise memo filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved to proceed further in this matter.

5.In view of that, this petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in respect of Crime No.43 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent, is quashed against the petitioners. The joint compromise memo shall form part of the record. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS I) /True copy/ Encl:Xerox copy of Compromise memo Sub Assistant Registrar To, 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Puzhuthipatty Police Station, Sivagangai District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High court, Madurai.

Copy to:Tamil Nadu Harijan Sevak Sangh, N.M.R.Subbaraman Memorial Residential Primary School Campus, 12, Dr.Thangaraj Road, Vinayagar Nagar, Opposite to Law College, Madurai-20 +1cc to Mr.R.Sivalingam, Advocate SR.No.64657 er sm:DB:17/11/2016:2P/5C Crl.O.P.(MD) No.20695 of 2016 01.11.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/