Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7319/2017ordered

M.Mohammed Tarieff v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-06-20Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.7319 of 2017 M.MOHAMMED TARIEFF ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AIRPORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT, CRIME NO.350/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.ARUMUGAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/who is arrayed as accused, in Crime No.350 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420, 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant and one Shankar are friends and the said Shankar introduced Latha, Anbalagan and Karthikeyan to him and all of them collusively made illusive statement that they can buy seized gold bars from the Customs Office of Trichy Airport for lowest rate. On believing their words, the de-facto complainant along with them went to Trichy for purchase of gold bar on 17.05.2017 and before reaching the Customs Office, five persons stopped their car and introduced themselves as Customs Officer and searching the car and also entered into the car and pulled out the cash and they made life threat to the de-facto complainant. Hence, the complaint has been lodged. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that

totally there are 7 accused, but the investigation has not found any evidence against this petitioner to implicate himself in this case.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 20/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI,TRICHY 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AIRPORT POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.ARUMUGAM Advocate SR.No.24605 AKV CSL/RR-BS/SAR-III/23.06.2017: 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.7319 of 2017 Date :20/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/