Sangiliammal v. The District Revenue Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Sangiliammal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.S.Anandha Prakash 3.Unique Barrior Films, Rep. by its Managing Director, T.Madhi Prakash.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 08.03.2024 filed by the petitioner to rectify the UDR mistake in respect of the property situated in S.No.375, Kottapatti Village, Virudhunagar Taluk and District measuring an extent of 37 Cents and for issuance of patta in the name of the petitioner. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Bala Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganeshan Addl. Government Pleader for R1.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent.

2.The first respondent is directed to dispose of the petition mentioned appeal on merits and in accordance with law within a period of sixteen weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The first respondent shall put the interested persons, if any, particularly the private respondents herein on notice before passing final order. It is open to the first respondent to pass order one way or the other.

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 25.03.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 2/4

To:- The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 25.03.2024 4/4