← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/20779/2016disposed of

Mahalakshmi, v. The Commissioner Of Police,

2016-11-02Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.20779 of 2016 Mahalakshmi .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2.The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch Police Station, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police,(Crime) Thilakar Thidal Police Station, Madurai District.

.. Respondents (R3 suo motu impleaded as third respondent, as per the order of this Court in this petition) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent police to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 08.10.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents : Mr.P.Kannithevan, Government Advocate(Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the first respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner, dated 08.10.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)on instructions, would submit that the complaint preferred by the petitioner is pending before the Inspector of Police (Crime), Thilakar Thidal Police Station, Madurai District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate, the Inspector of Police (Crime), Thilakar

Thidal Police Station, Madurai District, is suo motu impleaded as the third respondent in this petition and the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the third respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to take action in accordance with law.

5.This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

2.The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch Police Station, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police(Crime), Thilakar Thidal Police Station, Madurai District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc to M/s.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate in SR.No.65005 PJL CSL/PV/24.11.2016 :2P/6C Crl.O.P(MD)No.20779 of 2016 02.11.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/