K.Nagendran, v. The Principal Secretary,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.05.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.(MD)No.11520 of 2018 K.Nagendran ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9
2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peraiyur Road, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
4. The Tahsildar, Pattalakundu Road, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to consider the petitioner representation dated 28.04.2018 for accept the Village Administrative Officer recommendation to carrying out mutations in the revenue records for the Patta No.2216 in an 'A' Registered Record, Encumbering the Certificate, Citta and Computerized to the extent of 0.31.0 acres in Survey No.94/7 in the name of the petitioner landed property at Poochipatti Village, Nakkalapatti Post, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Nagendra Prasad For Respondents : Mr.K.Saravamam Government Advocate
O R D E R
Heard Mr.K.Nagendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition for
a Writ of Mandamus directing the third and fourth respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2018 and accept the Village Administrative Officer's recommendation to carry out mutations in the revenue records for the Patta No.2216 in an 'A' Registered Record, Encumbering the Certificate, Citta and Computerized to the extent of 0.31.0 acres in Survey No.94/7 in the name of the petitioner's property at Poochipatti Village, Nakkalpatti Post, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District. 3.Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that though in the revenue records the petitioner's name was found place, but in the web site, the petitioner's name was not mentioned and therefore, the petitioner's representation may be considered. 4.
In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court direct the third and fourth respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2018 and pass orders on merit and in accordance with law by rectifying the mistake, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Vacation Officer /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9
2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peraiyur Road, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
4. The Tahsildar, Pattalakundu Road, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
+ 1 CC TO Mr.K.NAGENDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 66246 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 66402 NS/GNS TE/SKN-RSK/SAR-1 : 08/06/2018 : 2P/7C W.P.(MD)No.11520 of 2018 30.05.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/