Chinnaramu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8854 of 2018 1 CHINNARAMU 2 MANIKANDAN 3 SEEMAAN @ ALAGARSAMY 4 NALLAMMAL 5 VALAR @ MALAR 6 MUTHULAKSHMI 7 CHINNAPONNU 8 MEENAKSHI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTY POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, CRIME NO.176/2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.ANANTHA DEVI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.176 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language and also threatened him with dire consequences. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the defacto complainant sustained only simple injury.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the defacto complainant sustained only simple injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTY POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.9191

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8854 of 2018 Date :30/05/2018 SMA/PN/GSR/31.05.2018:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/