Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1129/2015disposed of

K.Maheshwaran v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2015-01-30Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.01.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition (MD) No.1129 of 2015 K.Maheshwaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu rep through its Principal Secretary to the Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Fort St., George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Board of Directors, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., (TAHDCO), TNHB Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai 600 101.

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., (TAHDCO), TNHB Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai 600 101.

4.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., (TAHDCO), Thanjavur, Thanjavur District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to dispose the appeal dated 06.11.2013 filed by the petitioner against the order of termination dated 26.9.2013 in Se.Mu.Order No.A3/1047/2012 passed by the 3rd respondent herein.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.D.Murugandam, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.D.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The petitioner seeks for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by him against the order of termination passed by the third respondent. 3.It is seen that the petitioner was terminated from service by an order dated 26.09.2013 passed by the third respondent. Aggrieved against the said order, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the second respondent on 06.11.2013. It is contended that the said appeal preferred by the petitioner is still pending and not yet disposed of and therefore, it causes hardship to the petitioner. 4.Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and without expressing any view on the merits and contentions raised by the petitioner with regard to the punishment imposed on him, I only direct the second respondent to consider the appeal filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar /True copy/ sub Assistant Registrar(c.s) To 1.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Government of Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Fort St., George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Board of Directors, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., (TAHDCO), TNHB Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai 600 101.

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., (TAHDCO), TNHB Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai 600 101.

4.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd., TAHDCO), Thanjavur, Thanjavur District +1cc to Mr. M.P.Senthil, Advocate in SR.No. 4246 TS/23.02.2015/2P-6C Writ Petition (MD) No.1129 of 2015 30.01.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/