M.Amanullahkhan v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL M.Amanullahkhan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, O/o. the Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. Sheik Fareeth 4.Rafik Raja

5. Niyas 6.Pradap ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No. 1 to instruct the respondent No. 2 to take appropriate action against the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 on the basis of the petitioners 1/5

representation dated 05.03.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nihar Ali For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents 3 to 6 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 05.03.2025.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that based on the petitioner's representation, an FIR in Crime No.49 of 2025 was registered as against the respondents 3 to 6. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this case.

3.In reply, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that already the petitioner's sister lodged a complaint and based on that an 2/5

FIR has been registered and the petitioner also sustained injuries due to that incident and already he sent the medical reports to the investigation officer, but the same has not been considered. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass order.

5.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the second respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation during the investigation and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law.

6.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 19.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR 3/5

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Inspector of Police, O/o. the Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P.DHANABAL , J.

LR 19.03.2025 5/5