Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6623/2020dismissed

Anantha Babu v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-06-25Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.6623 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 25/06/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN CRL OP(MD). No.6623 of 2020

1. Anantha Babu

2. Marimuthu

3. M.Latha ... Petitioners/Rank Not known Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuam District.

(crime No.7 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.M.Perumal, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- To enlarge the Petitioners on Bail in the event of their arrest in connection with in Cr.No.7 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 498(A) and 506(i)of I.P.C., in Crime No. 7 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.6623 of 2020 above said case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that the First Information Report was registered in Crime No.7 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 498(A)and 506(i) of I.P.C. The defacto complainant is the wife of the first petitioner. They had love affairs and subsequently, got married and begotten a male child on 12.03.2020 and the first petitioner went to the parents house and not turned back. When the defacto complainant went to the first petitioner's house, namely the petitioners 2 and 3, she was subjected to physical cruelty. Hence, the complaint. He further submitted that the investigation is going on. 5.In view of the averments, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/- 25/06/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPUAM DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6623 of 2020 Date :25/06/2020 PD/VR/SAR 2/29.06.2020/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2