Pushbam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8901 of 2018 1 PUSHBAM 2 RAJU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANDALAMANICKAM POLICE STATION, KAMUTHI TALUK, RAMNAD DISTRICT CRIME NO. 34 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b) and 323 of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.34 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 20.05.2018, a wordy quarrel arose between the de-facto complainant's family and the petitioner's family. As a result, the 1st accused assaulted the defacto complainant. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramnad District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI, RAMNAD DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANDALAMANICKAM POLICE STATION, KAMUTHI TALUK, RAMNAD DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate SR.No.9223 MR/KSA GJM/CM/GSR/1.6.18-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8901 of 2018 Date :30/05/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/