Gowtham, v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8906 of 2018 1 GOWTHAM 2 DURAI @ SELVA DURAI 3 SABARI VIGNESH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.4 & 5 and 7 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.113/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.R.MURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A4, A5 and A7 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act r/w. Section 4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.113 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant is said to have been assaulted by the petitioners and four others due to previous enmity on 26.05.2018 and threatened with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent and he has submitted that the petitioners have caused damage worth about Rs.40,000/- [Rupees Forty Thousand only].

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners on stringent conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BAZAAR POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +2. CC to M/S.R.MURUGAN Advocate SR.No.9255 MR/KSA JAM/01/06/2018/ CSL/VK / 2P-7C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.8906 of 2018 Date :30/05/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/