S.K. Veluchamy @ Steephan v. The Superintendent Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD) No.21021 of 2016 S.K.Veluchamy @ Steephan ... Petitioner/Petitioner -vs1.

The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.

2.

The CBI Director, CBI Directorate, III Floor, Sastribavan, 26, Haddows Road, Nungampakkam, Chennai. ... Respondents/Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case against accused person for his above said criminal activities done on 30.05.2016 at 5.30 P.M. based on the representations of the petitioner dated 01.06.2016 and 10.06.2016.

For Petitioner: Mr.S.K.Veluchamy @ Steephan Party-in-Person For R1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.S.Jayakumar For Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases Reserved on Pronounced on 28.06.2017 30.06.2017 ******

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the case against accused person for his above said criminal activities done on 30.05.2016 at 5.30 P.M. based on the representations of the petitioner dated 01.06.2016 and 10.06.2016.

2. Heard the petitioner-in-person.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that one Kumarandi, who is working as Police Constable is living opposite to the house of the petitioner and that the said Kumarandi is causing obstruction to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the drainage pipes of the petitioner and is also letting out the drain water in front of the house of the petitioner. It is also alleged that when the petitioner questioned the said Kumarandi, he had damaged the drain pipes of the petitioner and therefore, the petitioner has given two representations dated 01.06.2016 and 10.06.2016 and subsequently, filed the present petition for a direction to have the case investigated by the CBI.

4. At the outset, the complaint given by the petitioner appears frivolous and does not inspire the confidence of this Court. That apart, no direction as prayed for by the petitioner can be issued in the light of the law laid down by this Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd. represented by its Director Rajendra Sheth No.7C, Second Canal Cross Road Gandhi Nagar Adyar, Chennai 600 020 vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, J-2, Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai 600 020 and another, reported in 2016 (2) CTC 286.

5. In the result, this petition is devoid of merits and the same is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S.) To:

1.

The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Theni, Theni District.

2.

The CBI Director, CBI Directorate, III Floor, Sastribavan, 26, Haddows Road, Nungampakkam, Chennai.

3.

The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.

The Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ar MAS/MR-KKR/SAR1:07.07.2017:2P-5C ORDER IN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.21021 of 2016 30.06.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/