Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8947/2018ordered

Rasu v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-05-30Honourable Mrs Justice T. Krishnavalli (Retd.)2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.KRISHNAVALLI CRL OP(MD) No.8947 of 2018 1 RASU 2 MARIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1 & 2 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ABIRAMAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME No.42 of 2018). ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.AROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed A1 & A2 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323, 324 of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, in Crime No.42 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel between the defacto complainant and petitioners, the petitioners have abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant and caused blood injury.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent and he has submitted that the victim has been treated as outpatient.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the nature of the allegation made against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kamuthi, Ramanathapuram District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/05/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KAMUTHI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ABIRAMAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.9310.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8947 of 2018 Date :30/05/2018 SDS/PN/ASVM/01.06.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/