Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6782/2020dismissed

Chinnasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-06-29Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6782 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6782 of 2020 Chinnasamy S/o.Chinnaiah ... Petitioner versus 1.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station Sivagangai District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police Pulithipatti Police Station Sivagangai District.

3.Vellaikannu S/o.Patchai 4.Villi S/o.Vellaikannu 5.Alagar S/o.Vellaikannu 6.Adaikkan S/o.Vellaikannu 7.Vellaiyan S/o.Vellaikannu ... Respondents Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to direct the respondent police to give police protection for the petitioner's life and limb, based on the complaint dated 06.03.2020.

For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For R1 and R2 :

Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to give police protection for the petitioner's life and limb, based on the compliant dated 06.03.2020.

2. According to the petitioner, he is having a property situated in S.No.326/11 at Ganapathipatti Village, Singampuneri Taluk, Sivagangai District and taking advantage of the position that he is working at Valaparai Estate, the respondents 3 to 7 are disturbing the possession of the petitioner's property and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6782 of 2020 therefore, he lodged a complaint before the second respondent on 07.12.2019 and after enquiry, the same was closed. Thereafter, on 06.03.2020 when the petitioner came to visit his property, the respondents 3 to 7 have abused the petitioner with filthy language and also threatened him. Hence, the petitioner preferred a further complaint against the respondents 3 to 7 on 06.03.2020. However, till date no action has been taken against the respondents 3 to 7. Hence, the petitioner came forward to file the present petition.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that second respondent has received a complaint from the petitioner with the allegations of criminal intimidation and after enquiry, it came to know that the allegations made by the petitioner in the complaint are false. Therefore, the petitioner was directed to approach the appropriate civil Court.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court directs the petitioner to file a necessary petition for injunction as against the respondents 3 to 7 before the appropriate civil Court, if he so advised.

5. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsm/msa Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Inspector of Police, Ulagampatti Police Station,Sivagangai District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police Pulithipatti Police Station,Sivagangai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6782 of 2020 29.06.2020 AP(03/07/2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2