Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/524/2020dismissed as infructuous

S.Navaneethakrishnan v. S.Cletus Babu

2024-01-23Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.01.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.3347 and 3356 of 2020 C.R.P.(MD).No.524 of 2020 S.Navaneethakrishnan ... Petitioner/Petitioner/10th Defendant Vs.

1.S.Cletus Babu ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Rasool Beevi 3.Parakathunisa 4.Mohideen Fathummal Beevi 5.Rahmathunnisa 6.Sunaitha Begam 7.K.M.Abdul Kader 8.K.M.Ahamed Meeran 9.K.M.Shahul Hameed 10.K.M.Alavudeen ... Respondents to 10/Respondents 2 to 10 Defendants 2 to 9 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.1024 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated 13.01.2020 on the file of the Additional 1/5

Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.M.Senguvijay.

C.R.P.(MD).No.527 of 2020 S.Navaneethakrishnan ... Petitioner/Petitioner/10th Defendant Vs.

1.Fort of Praise Ministries Trust, represented through its Financial Trustee, Mr.Nixon Paul Wesley, S/o.Rathinampaul, 9/918-M, Rahmath Nagar, Tirunelveli.

... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Ahamed Meeran Mytheen 3.Abdul Kader 4.Shahul Hameed 5.Rasool Beevi 6.Allauddin 7.Mohideen Fathummal 8.Parakathunnisa 9.Rahmathunnisa 10.Sunaitha Begam ... Respondents to 10/Respondents 2 to 10 Defendants 2 to 9 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.86 of 2016 in O.S.No.84 of 2012 dated 20.02.2018 on the file of the Additional Sub 2/5

Court, Tirunelveli.

For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For Respondent : Mr.V.Sujatha Siddharthan COMMON ORDER These revision petitions have been filed against the orders passed I.A.No.1024 of 2015 in O.S.No.76 of 2015 dated 13.01.2020 and I.A.No. 86 of 2016 in O.S.No.84 of 2012 dated 20.02.2018 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the main suits have been disposed of by the trial Court. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. 3.In view of the above said submission, this civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

23.01.2024 Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No TM 3/5

To 1.The Additional Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

TM 23.01.2024 5/5