← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4708/2024granted

Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-03-26Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/03/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI Raja ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The Inspector of Police, Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.150/2024).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M..Prabu, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.150/2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.03.2024 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 IPC r/w 1/6

Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957 in Crime No.150 of 2024, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported four bags of river sand. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and hence, he prayed for bail. However, on instructions, he would further submit that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- to the District Mineral Foundation Trust. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondentPolice would submit that no previous case is pending against the petitioner. 5.Heard the learned counsel on either side.

6.In view of the rehabilitation undertaken by the State Government under the Tamil Nadu District Mineral Foundation Rules, 2017, and in order to curb the illegal 2/6

sand mining activities and also considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner shall be directed to make a non refundable deposit of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust, without prejudice to his rights and contentions. The amount so deposited shall be utilised by the Trust for rehabilitation works.

7.It is made clear that the deposit of the amount by the petitioner to the Trust would not amount to admission of guilt. The trial Court shall deal with the case independently on merits without reference to the amount deposited at the stage of bail.

8.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: 9.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvaiyaru, and on further conditions that:

3/6

(a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) through demand draft to the credit of the Chairman/District Collector, District Mineral Foundation Trust of the concerned District, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

(c)the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; 4/6

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 26/03/2024 / TRUE COPY / 26/03/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (Writs) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

SJI TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVAIYARU.

2 DO-THROUGH :

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJORE DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

5/6

3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, THANJAVUR.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVAIYARU POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE CHAIRMAN/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, THANJAVUR.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4708 of 2024 Date :26/03/2024 SS/SAR- /26/03/2024/6P/7C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 6/6