Gunasekaran v. The Commissioner Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Gunasekaran ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, (Madurai City), Alagar Kovil Main Road, K.Pudur, 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Koodal Pudur, Madurai City, Madurai - 625 002.
3.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai - 625 017.
... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the karagattam programme on 31.03.2023 at 08.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. in connection with festival in Arulmigu Sri Manthaiyamman Temple at V.Karisalkulam, Madurai District by considering the petitioner 1/6
representation dated 16.03.2023 in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent grant permission and necessary protection to conduct the karagattam programme on 31.03.2023 at 08.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. in connection with festival in Arulmigu Sri Manthaiyamman Temple at V.Karisalkulam, Madurai District.
2. Mr.B.Nambiselvan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that temple festival at Arulmigu Sri Manthaiyamman Temple at V.Karisalkulam, Madurai District, is going to be held on 31.03.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a karagattam programme on 2/6
31.03.2023, they sought permission of the Police by giving a representation dated 16.03.2023. But, the third respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that he has no objection for granting permission to conduct a cultural programme subject to time restriction in between 07.00 p.m to 10.00 p.m. on 31.03.2023, and also submitted that the third respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of 3/6
applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the third respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 16.03.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, in the light of the above submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
27.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, (Madurai City), Alagar Kovil Main Road, K.Pudur, 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Koodal Pudur, Madurai City, Madurai - 625 002.
4/6
3.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai - 625 017.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, 5/6
G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Order made in Dated :27.03.2023 6/6