Seetha v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.8018 of 2017 SEETHA ... PETITIONER / A 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATHAMADAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 93/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A3 in Crime No.93 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 452, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC r/w section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner along with the other accused is alleged to have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, threatened and also attacked her. He would further submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are neighbours. Due to previous enmity, the present false complaint has been lodged. The petitioner is innocent. He has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint. He has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent / Police submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. The investigation is pending. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with

certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Cheran Mahadevi, Tirunelveli District and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

sd/- 28/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHERAN MAHADEVI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATHAMADAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.SATHYA CHIDAMBARAM Advocate SR.No.25301

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8018 of 2017 Date :28/06/2017 MKV-CM-SAR 1/30.6.2017/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/