Karuppasamy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.8071 of 2017 KARUPPASAMY ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION, THIRUCHULI, VIRUDHUNAGR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.200/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A-2, in Crime No.200 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of I.P.C r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Development and Regulation Act, 1957 and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and he is said to have transported 1 1⁄2 unit of sand without any valid permit. He further submitted that the petitioner does not have any previous case.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the confession of the driver and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this

Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUCHULI POLICE STATION, THIRUCHULI, VIRUDHUNAGR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate SR.No.25360 PM CSL/PM-PN/SAR-I/05.07.2017 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8071 of 2017 Date :29/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/