Sridhar. B v. The Assistant Engineer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN B.Sridhar ... Petitioner Vs.

The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO/M.E.D.C, Kallikudi, Madurai District.

... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the impugned communication issued vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Oo.Mi.Po./Pa/ Kalli/Aa N/028, dated 19.01.2021 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and thereby direct the respondent to change the address of Arulmigu Karuppasamy Kovil situated in Survey No. 261 at Chennampatti Village as Arulmigu Karuppasamy Kovil, Chennampatti 1/5

Village, Kallikudi Taluk, Madurai District, instead of S/o.Pitchaichettiyar, No.291/16, Narasinghamoorthy Kovil K.Chennampatti.

For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Naveen Kumar For Respondent : Mr.N.Deenadhayalan

O R D E R

The grievance of the petitioner is that the consumer name for service connection No.134-001-630 is in the name of Arulmigu Karuppasamy Kovil, Chennampatti Village, Kallikudi Taluk. However, in the address, it has been stated as 'son of Pitchaichettiyar', with an address. The learned counsel stated that this 'son of Pitchaichettiyar' should be removed. He says that the said Pitchai Chettiyar has no connection with the temple.

2. It is stated by the learned Standing counsel for the respondents that while updating the records in the computer, corrections will necessarily have to be made. He stated that the petitioner may give 2/5

a representation in this regard and if it is done so, then the respondent would examine the representation and issue notice to the petitioner and also issue notice to Pitchai Chettiyar in the address given in the service connection and thereafter, take a decision and the entry could be corrected accordingly, in terms of the enquiry conducted.

3. The Court cannot issue any such direction. It is only under the purview of the respondent to do the necessary needful. The entire exercise may be completed within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

27.03.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No rm 3/5

To The Assistant Engineer TANGEDCO/M.E.D.C, Kallikudi, Madurai District.

4/5

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

rm 27.03.2023 5/5