Nirvin@K.Nirvinkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18661 of 2018 NIRVIN @ K.NIRVINKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.598 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.A.CHANDRAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.M.S.CHANDRASEKARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 397 & 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.598 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 08.10.2018 at about 10 a.m., the accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1000/- by showing knife and ran away from the scene of occurrence after he raised alarm and public surrounded to the spot. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case at the instigation of Accused No.1 and he is an innocent person. He further submitted that the petitioner is studying II year B.Sc., and he has no connection with this case. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on heir appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul, Dindigul District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 16/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.A.CHANDRAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.19816

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18661 of 2018 Date :16/10/2018 MS/JC/SAR-1/22.10.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/