Suresh @ Sudalaimadan, v. The Sub Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18709 of 2018 1 SURESH @ SUDALAIMADAN 2 VELMURUGAN 3 CHANDRA ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.140 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners: Mr.R.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 294(b) and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.140 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the 1st petitioner has occupied the defacto complainant's agricultural property and the petitioners picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant and assaulted him and caused injuries.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are innocent. He further submitted that a counter case was also registered.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and the 3rd petitioner need not appear before the respondent police for interrogation and the petitioners 1 & 2 shall appear before the Respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 16/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIRUVEEDU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.R.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate SR.No.19803

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18709 of 2018 Date :16/10/2018 MS/JC/SAR-1/23.10.2018/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/