M.Ramar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.6852 of 2020 M.Ramar ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Pandalkudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
Cr.No.122/2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.122 of 2020 in the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 420, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.122 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- from the de-facto complainant for getting a job in TNEB Department. Thereafter, the petitioner neither secured a job nor refunded the amount. Hence, the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
3.Eventhough the matter was listed for several times, the learned counsel for the petitioner did not appear. Hence, I proceed to decide the matter on merits.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and gave a false promise that he will get a job to the de-facto complainant. Thereafter, the petitioner neither secured a job nor refunded the amount.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner has cheated the de-facto complainant and gave a false promise that he will get the job to the de-facto complainant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this petition stands dismissed. sd/- 26/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANDALKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.6852 of 2020 Date :26/08/2020 SJI TE/AKM/SAR-III : 31/08/2020 : 2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2