Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7132/2020disposed of

N.Murugesan v. The Commissioner Of Police

2022-03-01Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD)No.6572 of 2020 N.Murugesan

...Petitioner

/Vs./ 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, 3.The Sub-Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Theppakulam Police Station, 4.The Sub Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Theppakulam Police Station, 5.Maduraveeran 6.Jeyakumar 7.G.Rajendran 8.G.Rameshbabu 9.G.Swaminathan 10.G.Sureshbabu

...Respondents

Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 to 6 from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 7 to 10.

For Petitioner: No Appearance For R1 to R4 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor For R5 to R10 : No Appearance 1/3

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the respondents 1 to 6 from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 7 to 10.

2.Today (01.03.2022), when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, on instructions, would submit that both sides were enquired and they appeared before the respondent police and agreed to prosecute their right in the Civil Court. 4.In such view of the matter, no further order is required in this petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Myr Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Theppakulam Police Station, 3.The Sub-Inspector of Police (Law & Order), Theppakulam Police Station, 2/3

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, 01.03.2022 (CO) TR(17.03.2022) 3P 5C 3/3