Manivel v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL OP(MD) No.8209 of 2017 MANIVEL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED A2 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KANNIVADI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT CRIME NO. 136 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is Accused No.2 in Crime No.136 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 341 and 506(i) of IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3.The case of the prosecution is that there was a civil dispute between the petitioner and the defacto-complainant and there was a wordy quarrel. Hence, the present complaint has been lodged. 4.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 have already been released on bail in Cr.M.P.No.4624 of 2017 by the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul.
5.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is going on.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this
Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Dindigul and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a week ie., on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 30/06/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, DINDIGUL.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KANNIVADI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
SKM/ARUL CSL/KK/SAR-III/05.07.2017 : 2P/5C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8209 of 2017 Date :30/06/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/