Veerammal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of October Two Thousand and Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18756 of 2018 1.VEERAMMAL 2.RAKKU 3.BOOMATHI 4.STALIN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.PR BOOMEE RAJAN, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K.R.RAMAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(i) & 498(A) I.P.C in Crime No. not known, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners demanding additional dowry and harassed the defacto complainant and threatened her with filthy language.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are innocent. Hence, they have come up with this anticipatory bail.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and the petitioners 1, 2 & 3 need to appear before the respondent police for interrogation only when summoned and the 4th petitioner shall appear before the Respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 16/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.PR BOOMEE RAJAN Advocate SR.No.19837.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18756 of 2018 Date :16/10/2018 RAM/PN/SAR 1/22.10.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/