Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13410/2014dismissed as infructuous

Palanisamy v. The Tahsildar

2019-06-11Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD)No.13410 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Palanisamy ... Petitioner -VsThe Thasildar, Vedasanthur Taluk Office, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District.

...Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.14157/14/A2 dated 14.07.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to continue his work as village assistant. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramar Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar / True Copy / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- )

ta To The Thasildar, Vedasanthur Taluk Office, Vedasanthur, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-68265[F] dated 12/06/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.G.GOMATHISANKAR, Advocate ( SR-68529[F] dated 13/06/2019 ) W.P(MD)No.13410 of 2014 ES/21.06.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/