Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6909/2020dismissed

L.Illayaraja @ Ilasu v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

2020-07-01Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6909 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.O.P(MD)No.6909 of 2020 L.Illayaraja @Ilasu ... Petitioner/Accused No.4 Vs 1.The State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District (Crime No.67 /2020) 2.The Inspector of Police Devipattinam Police Station Ramanathapuram District (Crime No.67/2020) ... Respondents/Complainants 3.Vairava Kesu ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the District and Sessions Court (Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Ramanathapuram to accept the surrender of the petitioner/Accused No.4 and consider the petitioner's bail application and grant bail on the date of surrender itself in Crime No.67 of 2020 dated 22.03.2020 on the file of the respondent No.2 Police.

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Anandharaj Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner is shown as an accused in Crime No.67 of 2020 registered on the file of the Inspector of Police, Devipattinam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District, for the offences under Sections 147, 307, 302 I.P.C and Section 3(1) (r) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The second respondent police registered the case against the petitioner without having any material and hence, he prayed to allow this petition.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6909 of 2020 submits that the petitioner is having six previous cases and this case also comes under Section 302 I.P.C. Therefore, he opposes to allow this petition.

4.Heard, Mr.I.Pinaygash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Anandharaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

5.Considering the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Criminal Original Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) msa/vsm To

1. The District and Sessions Judge (Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) PoA Act 1989 Ramanathapuram

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police Ramanathapuram District 3.The Inspector of Police Devipattinam Police Station Ramanathapuram District 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.6909 of 2020 01.07.2020 KV (08.07.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2