Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8335/2017allowed

Bala @ Periya Murugan, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-07-04Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR CRL.O.P.(MD)No.8335 of 2017 1.Bala @ Periya Murugan 2.John Britto 3.Ajith Kumar 4.Prabakaran 5.Rajesh @ Rajesh Kumar 6.Santhanakumar : Petitioners/Accused 1 to 6 -Vs1.State through Inspector of Police Thermal Nagar Police Station, Tuticorin District 2.Prathap : Respondents/Complainants PRAYER:Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records relating to Crime No.90/2017 dated 27.06.2017 on the file of the 1st respondent Police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Moorthy.

For Respondent No.1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to Crime No.90 of 2017, dated 27.06.2017 on the file of the 1st respondent Police and quash the same.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent.

3. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/defacto complainant, a case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.90 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC., on the file of the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the petitioners as well as the second respondent appeared in person and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the identity of the parties by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) through the respondent police and they categorically made a statement that the dispute between them have been settled amicably. They also filed a memo of compromise dated 30.06.2017 duly signed by both parties and counter signed by their respective Counsel.

5. In view of the statements made by the parties and the compromise memo filed by them, no fruitful purpose will be achieved if the complaint is proceeded further.

6. In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.90 of 2017 for the offences under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC., on the file of the first respondent are quashed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police Thermal Nagar Police Station, Tuticorin District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/S. S.MOORTHY, Advocate, SR.No.63287. CRL.O.P.(MD)No.8335 of 2017 04.07.2017 das/pjl SDS/SKN:RSK/SAR 1/20.07.2017/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/