← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/21940/2016granted

Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-11-18Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.21940 of 2016 1 MANIKANDAN 2 INBARAJ 3 RAGURAM ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CR.NO.117/2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 447, 294(b), 342, 323, 427 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.

117 of 2016 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners along with other accused trespassed into the field of the de facto complainant and damaged the crops. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that investigation is pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the gravity of offence said to have been committed by the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appearance, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a]the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders. [b]the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [c]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d]on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005 AIR SCW 5560).

sd/- 18/11/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.70540.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21940 of 2016 Date :18/11/2016 AM/SK SKN/SAR-3/24.11.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/