Balakumar v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

1. Balakumar

2. Siva @ Sivakumar

3. Ponkumar @ Marimuthu

4. Balakumar

5. Nehru ... Petitioners Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy City, Crime No.13 of 2016.

2. Selvakumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petitions have been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records relating to the proceedings in 1/5

P.R.C.No.67 of 2023 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI,Tiiruchirappalli and quash the same as against the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.S. Mahendra Pathy, For R1 : Mr.M.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.K.Sridhar

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to P.R.C.No.67 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI,Tiiruchirappalli for the offences under Sections 448, 147 and 294(b)of IPC and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.13 of 2016 and quash the same.

2. According to the petitioners, based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No. 13 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 448, 147 and 294(b)of IPC and 2/5

Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in P.R.C.No. 67 of 2023, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

4. Today, all the accused are present and the defcto complainant appeared through video conferencing and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise. A compromise memo, dated 11.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition. 3/5

7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and P.R.C.No.67 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI,Tiiruchirappalli is quashed.

20.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Tiiruchirappalli.

2. The State of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector of Police, Airport Police Station, Trichy City.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J.

LR 20.03.2025 5/5