K Sivanantham v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI K.SIVANANTHAM ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JEEYAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT CRIME NO. 68 OF 2024 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.A.ARUN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.MANIKANDAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. PRAYER:

FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN CRIME NO. 68 OF 2024 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT POLICE.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.68 of 1/5

2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 06.03.2024 at about 5.30 p.m., there was dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant regarding dumping of waste, at that time, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod and caused injuries. Hence, this complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The defacto complainant and the petitioner are neighbors. Actually, on 06.03.2024, the petitioner pore sand mound on the road to level the ground, at that time, the defacto complainant came by bike, got skit and he fell down on the road. Further, the injured is discharged from the hospital. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that injured is discharged from the hospital. Hence, he has no objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the 2/5

fact that the injured is discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichy, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)if the petitioner failed to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, he shall appear before the respondent Police as 3/5

and when required;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 27/03/2024 / TRUE COPY / /03/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I /II /III /IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

INDU TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III TRICHY.

4/5

DO THROUGH:

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE JEEYAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.S.VINODH, Advocate ( SR-3898[I] dated 28/03/2024 )

ORDER

IN Date :27/03/2024 PKP/VR/SAR /28.03.2024/ 5P/ 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 5/5