Rooban v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.5292 of 2025 Rooban ..Petitioner .vs.

1. The Inspector of Police Utchipuli Police Station Ramanathapuram District

2. Negendran

3. Latha

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.20 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram District and quash the same, For petitioner : Mr.A.Naresh Prabu For Respondents : Mr. M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl side) For R2& R3 : Mr.Mariselvam ***** Page No. 1 of 5

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending in C.C.No.20 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram District.

2. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Crime No.15 of 2019 for the offences under Sections 448,294(b),427,386 of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.20 of 2025 , the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

4. Today, the defacto-complainant and the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defactocomplainant represented that they entered into a compromise. A compromise memo, dated 17.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court. Page No. 2 of 5

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.20 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram District is quashed. The compromise memo dated 17.03.2025 filed by the parties shall form part of this order.

24.03.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav Page No. 3 of 5

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram District

2. The Inspector of Police Utchipuli Police Station Ramanathapuram District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J.

aav Crl.OP(MD) No.5292 of 2025 24.03.2025 Page No. 5 of 5