← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8589/2021disposed of

Thulasi v. The Dist.Forest Officer

2021-04-27Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2021 Thulasi ... Petitioner -VsThe District Forest Officer and Forest Conservator, Kanyakumari Range, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to sanction the permission to cut the 28 Teak wood trees and 250 Rubber trees available in the Survey No.589/8, 589/9 in Surulakodu Revenue Village of Thiruvattaru Taluk, Kanyakumari District and transport the same for marketing purpose based on petitioner's representation, dated 27.01.2020 within the time limit as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raghul Priyan For Respondent : Mr.S.Dhayalan Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant permission to the petitioner to cut 28 Teak Wood Trees and 250 Rubber Trees available in Survey Nos.589/8, 589/9 in Surulakodu Revenue Village, Thiruvattaru Taluk, Kanyakumari District and transport the same for marketing purpose, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 27.01.2020.

2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the owner of the land in Survey Nos.589/8 and 589/9 to an extent of 2 acres in Surulakodu Revenue Village. In the said land, 28 Teak Trees and 200 Rubber Trees are available and they attained maturity. Therefore, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent on 27.01.2020, requesting him to allow her to cut the trees and transport to the place of marketing. But till date, the said representation was not considered. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given a representation to the respondent on 27.01.2020, along with the relevant documents and since there is no order passed, the petitioner is before this Court. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2021

4. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner has given a representation along with the relevant documents, I do not find any acknowledgement in the typed set of papers. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation to the respondent along with the relevant documents, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) akv Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To The District Forest Officer and Forest Conservator, Kanyakumari Range, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-17949[F] dated 28/04/2021 ) W.P.(MD)No.8589 of 2021 27.04.2021 RK(12.05.2021) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2